Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
Cecil, I am fully aware of the "original argument". To confess my bias, I agree with Tom D. and Tom R. There is no "current drop" ever, and there is no current change in an ideal inductor. W8JI explains in some detail why real coils show different currents at each end. So do I, Gene. Have you looked at my web page? A standing-wave antenna contains standing waves. The forward and reflected currents superpose. If there is any phase shift at all through a 75m bugcatcher coil, the current at the bottom and at the top will NOT be equal even if the forward current through the coil is constant and the reflected current through the coil is constant. If you disagree with me and agree with Tom, you are saying there is zero phase shift through a one foot by one foot bugcatcher coil. Do you really want to assert that? How can there possibly be a current drop across a dimensionless point? The fact is, a dimensionless point inductance does NOT and can NOT exist in reality. So are more interested in playing games in your mind than you are in the real world? The argument is about real world 75m bugcatcher coils, not ideal inductances that exist only in someone's wet dream. Your example is a circuit, not a distributed network, and is therefore irrelevant to this discussion. Distributed networks behave different enough from lumped circuits that the lumped circuit shortcuts just don't work on distributed networks. Why you and Tom want to force your lumped constant concepts unquestioned upon the field of distributed network problems is beyond me. Your RG-58 transmission line example is no different. The current from the source is not lost or "dropped". It simply finds other paths in addition to the "load" to return back to the source. Antennas and loading coils exhibit the same phenomenon. Some of the power radiated from an antenna does NOT return to the source. It may even escape to outer space. Power lost from the system causes a current drop. In fact, it is hard to separate the H-field from the E-field for RF. I am amazed how you guys have been seduced by your math models. Reality is supposed to dictate math models, not vise versa. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |