Tom Donaly wrote:
Go to Tom's home page and read _everything_ he wrote about loading
coils and come back here and tell us what he really thinks.

Once again, the argument is not about what is on Tom's web page. The
argument is about what Tom asserted in his argument with Yuri on
eHam.net. Diverting attention to his web page is just, well, an
obvious diversion of the issue.

If I say there is no God on eHam.net and don't say it on my web page
does that prove I never said it?

You said:
Since when has anyone claimed it's impossible to make a coil that
has a non-constant current distribution?

When was August 10, 2003:

In Search of 'The Perfect Mobile Antenna':
Reply by W8JI on August 10, 2003
Yuri, You are like to call names, insult people, and argue rather than
take the time to learn basic electronics. This is in any book, including
the ARRL Handbook. If you look at HOW an inductor works, the current
flowing in one terminal ALWAYS equals the current flowing out the other
terminal. THE VOLTAGE can be (and is) different on each end of the inductor,
NOT the current.

During that argument, W8JI presented the lumped inductance in EZNEC as proof
of the above statement.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---