Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
"A wire antenna is a circuit with distributed constants; Terman, Kraus, Balanis, ... what do they know? :-) Apparently, a lot of the otherwise knowledgeable people on this newsgroup have forgotten that the formula for the characteristic impedance of a single-wire transmission line is 138*log(4h/d) where h is the height of the wire above ground and d is the diameter of the wire. There's no difference between that single-wire transmission line and a lot of ham antennas. That single-wire transmission line radiates just like an antenna. 1/2WL of #16 wire 24 feet in the air has a Z0 of 600 ohms. If that center-fed dipole were terminated at each end with a 600 ohm load, it would be a traveling-wave antenna with a feedpoint impedance of 600 ohms. Take away the loads and there's a match to 50 ohm coax at the feedpoint. The only difference in those two antennas is that removing the loads turned the antenna into a standing-wave antenna and reflections are arriving back at the feedpoint, lowering the feedpoint impedance. Any coil installed in a standing wave antenna is going to be subjected to both forward and reflected currents. There is no hope of understanding the current in a loading coil without understanding the component currents flowing both directions through the loading coil. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |