Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, I take issue with this. The radiation resistance, as universally
used in the professional literature, *is* a distributed radiation resistance -- it's the resistance that "consumes" the power radiated from the entire antenna, not just one point on the antenna. But that entire power-consuming property is commonly lumped into a single component -- the "radiation resistance" which can be defined (or "referred to") anywhere on the antenna you'd like, including but not limited to the feedpoint. And when placed at that point, it consumes the amount of power radiated from the entire antenna. It's not one single, absolute value, but a component whose value depends on where you define it on the antenna. A very simple and correct way of looking at it is to realize that if P watts is being radiated from the antenna, the radiation resistance value has to equal P/I^2, where I is the magnitude of the current at the point where you're measuring or defining the radiation resistance. So the radiation resistance always "consumes" P watts. If you want to calculate efficiency, you have to do the same thing with the loss resistance, and make a single R that consumes the same amount of power as the total antenna loss. Again, you can define it anywhere on the antenna including the feedpoint, and it'll have a different value wherever you put it. To calculate efficiency from radiation and loss resistances, both have to be -- correctly -- defined at (or "referred to") the same point. There's no need for additional "essential" fundamental terms -- the simple concept of radiation resistance as I've described it is perfectly adequate to explain and calculate antenna radiation and efficiency. But like other concepts, it does take a little effort to understand it. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Reg Edwards wrote: Radiation Resistance. Roy, what an excellent, well needed exposition, in plain English, addressed mainly to professionals who should know better, and are guilty (dare I say it) of obtaining money under false pretences. You omitted only "DISTRIBUTED radiation resistance", a term essential to but absent from this newsgroup. It's probably also absent from Terman and Kraus, the latter I have never read. It's an aid to clear logical thought. It should be used whenever radiation resistance is compared with conductor resistance, inductance, capacitance, etc., of elongated wires and loading coils. As an example, it so happens that the distributed, end-to-end, radiation resistance, Rd, of a half-wave diopole is exactly twice (easily proved) the feedpoint resistance of around 72 ohms. The radiating efficiency of a half-wave dipole is then, very simply and accurately - Efficiency = 144 / ( 144 + overall HF conductor resistance ) although some old-wives may wish to argue about it on the grounds that it's far too simple. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |