| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roy Lewallen wrote:
According to the many references I have, the equation you quote is a simplified equation that's valid for a single wire over a perfect conducting ground plane, where the height is a very small fraction of a wavelength (i.e., radiation is negligible). Even if everything you say is true, it doesn't nullify the concepts of physics. Even if the Z0 is changing point to point along the length of the wire, as it surely does for a vertical antenna, the idea that standing wave antennas don't possess standing waves is ridiculous. The idea that the net antenna current on a standing wave antenna is not itself a standing wave is ridiculous. The idea that the net antenna current on a standing wave is not the result of the superposition of the forward current and reflected current is ridiculous. The idea that RF waves can stand still is ridiculous. The idea that current flows in only one direction in a standing wave antenna is ridiculous. A Rhombic, for instance, is a traveling wave antenna. Its feedpoint impedance is equivalent to its characteristic impedance which is hundreds of ohms. In a standing wave antenna, it is the reflected wave superposing with the forward wave at the feedpoint that determines the feedpoint impedance, low for 1/2WL center-fed dipoles and high for 1WL center-fed dipoles. The feedpoint impedance depends upon interference between the forward wave and the reflected wave. All you have proven is that this is a difficult subject to quantitize, but we already knew that. It is not a difficult subject to conceptualize. So, Roy, please answer the following true/false questions. Standing wave antennas actually exhibit standing waves as described by Kraus, Balanis, and others. ______ Standing waves are created by the superposition of forward waves and reflected waves. ________ RF waves cannot stand still. _______ If true, it follows that "standing" waves are an artifact of superposition and cannot exist without the two underlying component waves. What is moving at the speed of light is the forward wave and the reflected wave. ________ Hint: RF waves must move at the speed of light. Therefore, RF standing waves have two components, each moving at the speed of light in opposite directions. For what it's worth, here's a quote from The ARRL Antenna Book, 15th edition, page 24-22 under "Single Wire Line": "The characteristic impedance of the single wire line depends on the conductor size and the height of the wire above ground, ranging from 500 to 600 ohms for #12 or #14 conductors at heights of 10 to 30 ft." Nothing said about "perfect ground" or "small fractions of wavelength". Again, the concepts that I discuss fall out perfectly from the laws of physics. That they are difficult to quantify is not a good reason to adopt a closed mind. (This reminds me of my Southern Baptist upbringing where some subjects were forbidden). -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||