On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 13:57:16 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:
The combined effort to suppers the ideas of Kraus and Balanis is getting
Darn spellchecker. "suppers" should be "suppress".
more ridiculous with each passing day. It can no longer be explained by
ignorance.
Blame the spellchecker?

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 13:57:16 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:
The combined effort to suppers the ideas of Kraus and Balanis is getting
Darn spellchecker. "suppers" should be "suppress".
more ridiculous with each passing day. It can no longer be explained by
ignorance.
Blame the spellchecker?

C'mon, Richard. That's a cheap shot beneath even you, I thought.

On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:06:42 -0600, "John Smith"
wrote:
C'mon, Richard. That's a cheap shot beneath even you, I thought.

Hi John,

Your exposure to cheap shots is clearly shallow. ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:06:42 -0600, "John Smith"
wrote:
C'mon, Richard. That's a cheap shot beneath even you, I thought.

Hi John,

Your exposure to cheap shots is clearly shallow. ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Yes, Master.

Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Darn spellchecker. "suppers" should be "suppress".

Blame the spellchecker?

Yep, it changed "supress" to "suppers".
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:05:49 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Yep, it changed "supress" to "suppers".
An expensive Bank Shot....