Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Almost 1%! Holy moly!
You're correct that the distribution is only approximately triangular. But since a difference between a full quarter sine wave and a true triangular distribution results in less than a 0.5 dB difference in field strength, a 1% difference between a true triangular distribution and the end of a sine wave will make a difference in gain, efficiency, or feedpoint impedance that would be entirely negligible and in fact impossible to measure. For that matter, the current distribution on a wire of finite diameter isn't really a sine wave anyway, but a close approximation (although very possibly not within 1%). So the current distribution on a short antenna is triangular for any practical purpose. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Cecil Moore wrote: Roy Lewallen wrote: This is indeed an interesting result, even though it's small. As a dipole or monopole gets shorter than a resonant length, the current distribution changes from sinusoidal to triangular. Actually, it just moves to a straighter portion of the sinusoidal curve. The cosine curve from 75 degrees to 90 degrees does resemble a triangle but it is not a straight line. Assuming a triangle from 75 deg to 90 deg is a simplified shortcut that introduces almost a 1% error at 82.5 deg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |