Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy, W7EL wrote:
"The principles involved are really simple and I hate to see them made unecessarily complex by misinterpretation." Amen. Directive gain according to Terman is distribution in space of radiated power versus the power that would be radiated by an isotropic. Losses are not considered. Power gain takes loss into account and is the ratio of the power necessary to an isotropic versus the power to a gain antenna required for the same signal strength in the same direction. Kraus says the directive gain is the ratio of maximum power density to its average value over a sphere as observed in the far field. Terman and Kraus agree in their calculated examples. The directive gain of an elementary dipole (Kraus says maybe i/10-wavelength) is 1.5. It can be found on page 34 of Kraus` 3rd edition. It`s the same on page 871 of Terman`s 1955 edition. The directive gain of a 1/2-wavelength dipole is 1.64 for Terman. For Kraus, it`s 1.63 on page 35. These are power ratios, not dB. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |