On 19 Oct 2004 02:39:05 GMT, oUsama (Yuri Blanarovich)
wrote:
We pointed out the fallacies in the way EZNEC models the coil, examples were
given how to get around using hairpin or coil modeled as a "helix" by breaking
turns into segments.

Hi Yuri,

You fail to attribute WHO provided those "breaking turns into
segments" which was/is/isn't(?) documented at your
current/former/removed(?) page as myself and Roy. Making this a part
of the current software version is hardly the epiphany of a visitation
seeking the absolution from sin.

As I pointed out before, nothing new has been added and the fire has
been drowned in spit.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hi Yuri,

You fail to attribute WHO provided those "breaking turns into
segments" which was/is/isn't(?) documented at your
current/former/removed(?) page as myself and Roy. Making this a part
of the current software version is hardly the epiphany of a visitation
seeking the absolution from sin.

As I pointed out before, nothing new has been added and the fire has
been drowned in spit.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


How eloquently formulated and true. Xcuse my sloppynessss. You and W4RNL showed
when coil is modeled as wire running around in circles with reasonable
segmentation, the current is modeled very close to reality - different at both
ends and not equal. Anybody can verify that with HELIX feature in EZNEC 4.08.

Actually there is another cudo to you for the treatment of space impedance and
interaction with antenna impedance. I have questioned that way back and was
shut off as ridiculous (Roy?). Your color pictures are very illustrative.

Another "silly me" try at using term of "electrical length of conductor or
antenna element" vs. physical, was poo-poohed by Roy - no such thing in
textbooks. Regardles, I keep using it, makes sense, especially with insulated
wires and oddball conductors.

I apologize for not doing the promised article, life has been just too much
here, but I keep hoping for better days and nicer weather. We have acquired
lovely beachfront QTH at the Jersey shore, across the bay with potential of
having superb antenna test field. This is next to 170 acre Rhombic antenna
farm. Looking forward to fooling around with some crazy things.

73 Yuri, K3BU

On 19 Oct 2004 17:06:36 GMT, oUsama (Yuri Blanarovich)
wrote:

Looking forward to fooling around with some crazy things.

Hi Yuri,

There is considerable merit in that too.

I hope you were reading my recent correspondence about digital RF
sources (seems like it would be a natural for your own digital
project).

Well, as for fooling around, I'm off to the campus for more Nanotech.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

I hope you were reading my recent correspondence about digital RF
sources (seems like it would be a natural for your own digital
project).

Well, as for fooling around, I'm off to the campus for more Nanotech.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Thanks! Yes, I am trying to keep up with all the new stuff, plus some older, I
have been out of main stream circuit design for a while, but looks like the
timing is just like back then on the trehshold between sparks and tubes. One
think that our dual channel DSPed RX will allow is to stear the antenna
patterns and some far out noise elimination and processing.

We have standing invitation to the brightest minds among hams to contribute or
participate in the Dream Radio One project. www.computeradio.us

Yuri, K3BU