Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Ken Bessler
writes Can anyone tell me why I get a worse SWR at 100w than at 5w? I know the reflected power goes up but I'm using a cross needle meter here so I'm referring to the actual ratio. Which SWR should I trust? Ken It's all to do with the knee of the diodes. The rectification efficiency of diodes drops off rapidly when the level of the applied RF signal is low. Assuming that the SWR is fairly good, but not 1:1, with 100W the reverse detector will get a reasonable level of RF, and will be reasonably efficient. The forward detector will, of course, get lots of RF, and will be very efficient. The result of this is that you get a pretty accurate (if slightly optimistic) indication of the SWR. At 5W, the reverse detector will get less than a quarter of the voltage than at 100W, and this will make it fairly inefficient - so inefficient that the diode hardly works at all. However, even though the forward detector will also get less than a quarter of the 100W voltage, this will still be sufficient for it to be reasonably efficient. As a result, you still get a good reading for the forward power, but essentially nothing for the reverse. As you are not really seeing the reflected power, the SWR looks decidedly optimistic. Ian. -- |