Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Richard Clark wrote: Rarely do we get any practical correlation from this "sky is falling" oops "current is dropping" argument. Asserting that the argument is about any practical correlation is a diversion of the issue. THE ARGUMENT IS ABOUT THE CURRENT IN A LOADING COIL, not about the radiation pattern. The radiation pattern is completely irrelevant to the argument. One side says the current is absolutely constant except for radiation. The other side says it is not constant (except for special cases). An electrical 1/4WL loaded mobile antenna is not one of the special cases. Sorry, this may sound dumb, I think I must have missed the point. Why are people arguing about current in a loading coil? NEC, and experiment, seem to provide the answer. 73, Frank |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna |