LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22   Report Post  
Old October 28th 04, 02:11 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
I will leave Cecil's equation to Cecil, ...


The equation, Itot=Ifor+Iref, doesn't look complex, but it is. :-)

Not sure if you saw it, but it looks to me that even EZNEC 4+ is on "our" side.


I modeled an eight-sided coil in EZNEC 2.0 before I knew EZNEC+
had a helical feature. The result is at:

http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/octcoil.gif

EZNEC reports that the current at the top of the coil is 0.5326
amps while the current at the bottom of the coil is 0.9956 amps.
I plotted the current in all 40 EZNEC 2.0 coil segments - looks
close to a cosine function to me with the coil occupying
roughly 50 degrees of the antenna.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current in antenna loading coils controversy Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 454 December 12th 03 03:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017