But that is totally untrue!
He was invited to Congress to pass on information that was spoken about
at a Vietnam veterans get together that occured a few weeks earlier.
He at no time admitted to first hand knoweledge on the veracity of the
cruelty claims made at that convention.
And I do not believe the GOP claims otherwise.
He was at that time a veteran himself as well as being against the war but
if I remember correctly many
showed their feelings by crossing the border, where as he protested using
the ideals that all fight for
.........free speech .
Bush chose the service aproach that many tried for and was successful, both
he and Kerry
were just part of those times and neither should be villified.
If one has first hand knoweledge then he has the right of free speech, when
one uses
free speech without true knoweledge and for his own means then he/she
betrays the ideals for
which one fights for.
Art

"Tom Ring" wrote in message
. ..
political commentary wrote:


The point is you want to elect a cheater.

Thats not a very smart thing to do is it?



You mean as opposed to a confessed war criminal, who in congressional
hearings admitted to burning villages, killing innocent women and
children, and shooting unarmed enemy soldiers in the back as they ran?
That kind of thing? Like Kerry?

tom
K0TAR