Richard Clark wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:
I suspect you still don't know what I am talking about.

Logic chips are a far cry from EM emissions, much less antennas.

Assuming the auto LEDs have three states, off, taillight, and
brakelight, that is taking data from three different input
sources and combining them into one time-shared output. That,
my friend, meets the definition of multiplexing even if only
trivially.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 23:33:59 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Assuming the auto LEDs have three states ... That,
my friend, meets the definition of multiplexing even if only
trivially.
OK, a trivial sidebar of unrelated trinary logic: Yes/No/Maybe
Wasn't this Galileo's plea before the Holy See?

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
SNIP
Wasn't this Galileo's plea before the Holy See?

Nah. The Holy See wanted proof, which Galileo didn't have. WTHDTSHTDW
r.r.a.a.?

David J Windisch wrote:
"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
SNIP

Wasn't this Galileo's plea before the Holy See?


Nah. The Holy See wanted proof, which Galileo didn't have. WTHDTSHTDW
r.r.a.a.?


Actually the Holy See didn't want proof, Which Galileo DID have.

Dave N.

Actually, Dave, what I should have written, is that Isaac Newton later
provided the proof Galileo needed to support his hypothesis.

Further, it was to the Holy Office, at Rome, not to the Holy See, that
Galileo presented himself.

Now, what is that proof of which you write?

73, Dave, N3HE

"David G. Nagel" wrote in message
...
SNIP
Actually the Holy See didn't want proof, Which Galileo DID have.

Dave N.