Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jackson wrote:
People keep saying that they use 4:1 or 9:1 baluns. Often I can see no reason for this (such as when simply feeding a dipole with coax, or on the output of an ATU). I'm obviously missing the point. Why the impedance transformation? Ian. The feedpoint impedance of a dipole varies with frequency from a low value of about 50 ohms to a high value of about 8000 ohms. In between, it can look like 1000(+/-)j1000 ohms. Baluns with a high transforming ratio try to take the impedance lower so, for instance, with a 4:1 balun, the above values would ideally go from 50 ohms to 12.5 ohms, 8000 ohms to 2000 ohms, and from 1000+j1000 ohms to 250+j250 ohms. You can see that the second set of values have a smaller absolute range than the first set, thus making them an easier match for the tuner. That's the simplified version. There are disadvantages to using baluns with a high transforming ratio. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Baluns for RX doublet | Antenna | |||
Choke Baluns again. New program | Antenna | |||
Balun's... I'm confused... | Antenna | |||
Baluns | Antenna | |||
Make your own Baluns | Antenna |