Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:06:59 +0000, Ian Jackson
wrote: But how good is the efficiency when the balun/transformer is working between completely the wrong impedances (which will be most of the time)? My understanding (and limited experience) is that most of your power simply heats up the ferrite. Hi Ian, In a current BalUn it is the Common Mode current that is absorbed by the BalUn as a choke (one purpose of two purposes to use it). The current BalUn is designed to add R rather than X to the Common Mode path (although, any additional X that comes down the pike is not shrugged off). Thus the product of that current and that resistance is heat. However, if you have a sufficient R, it snubs the I before you get to many Watts. A string of 20 beads can present upwards to 1000 Ohms resistance, but I wouldn't try to dissipate more than 20W throughout. Now, as to efficiency. I presume the load is a nominal 50 Ohms, and that it is paralleled by that choke's 1000 Ohms. If we were in a condition where that same 1000 Ohms were dissipating 20W then it follows that the load is dissipating 400W. This is about the time when some Hams begin to tear their hair and fulminate at the BalUn (which is doing its job faithfully) rather than asking themselves the question: "why is my antenna system trying to pump that current down the transmission line?" If they solved that question, then they would have more power available for their intended load. Others who would have reflected on that question naturally, they would have shrugged their shoulders and figure chasing that last 5% efficiency exceeded the small price they paid for the BalUn - which was working quite well. Now, consider if that BalUn were to suddenly vanish. The same current which formerly saw 1000 Ohms, would see none. We can all work out the equivalent resistance of 0 Ohms paralleled to the intended load of 50 Ohms to observe where the power would eventually go. This is so extreme as to be absurd (or at least rare). Such a radical possibility necessarily presumes a rather disastrous implication in the state of the antenna's design - or damage. However, none of this actually answers your question about "wrong impedances," but it does respond to the worst efficiency you could expect. By and large, when you are in the middle-to-near fringes of the BalUn's operational range, efficiencies are exceptionally high (95% to 99+%). Whatever power that is lost to improper matching occurs in far greater abundance elsewhere. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Baluns for RX doublet | Antenna | |||
Choke Baluns again. New program | Antenna | |||
Balun's... I'm confused... | Antenna | |||
Baluns | Antenna | |||
Make your own Baluns | Antenna |