Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A number of superconducting antennas have been built and the results
published. The ones I recall seeing were using the newer high temperature superconductors, although it can be done with conventional superconductors also. It doesn't seem to be generally known that superconductors have zero resistance only at DC. Their resistance is finite at any frequency above zero. It increases with frequency, and it also increases as the temperature rises toward the critical temperature (at which the material ceases becoming a superconductor). The resistivity of copper drops pretty dramatically at cryogenic temperatures, so copper becomes pretty hard to beat at RF, particularly if the temperature is getting anywhere near the critical temperature of the competing superconducting material. The potential advantage to be gained from a lossless antenna is that a very small, efficient antenna can be made. The problems a 1. You have a really tough matching problem, and will have severe loss in your matching network unless it's also superconducting. 2. If you do keep the antenna and matching network losses to a small value, a very small antenna will be very narrow banded. 3. You'll have to keep the temperature far below the critical temperature if you want to do much better than copper. This probably means cooling to a few degrees Kelvin, which is expensive and not compatible with putting antenna high and in the clear, let alone making one that can be rotated, for example. And the advantage of a small antenna is likely to be negated by the size of the cooling equipment. 4. Because the antenna will have finite resistance and presumably a small size, application of transmitter power will cause heating. This heat has to be removed by the refrigeration equipment to avoid raising the temperature too much. A google search on "superconducting antenna" will bring you a lot of papers, but probably not much in the way of commercial products. While interesting in the laboratory, the above problems limit the practicality of the idea. Roy Lewallen, W7EL ml wrote: i just wonder does anyone know of any links to articles on a small superconducting antenna say for hf frequencies what would happen if i build say i'd have to stay physically small , so say a 1/4wave verticle on 10m and then made that antenna supercondutive? the antenna would technically have like no resistance that i know then i get fuzzy wonder what happens both technically speaking and if anyone tried it, was it a 'great' antenna rx or tx wise?? any pro's con's of such a design aside from the obv cost and impracticaliaty of pumping Lhydr/liq helium or nitrog into it etc |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |