| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Cecil Moore
wrote: ? It's certainly more economical to increase the transmitter's power output than to supercool a dipole. it think this statement is not totally correct, as if someone manages to build an antenna that serves some pourpose that achieves it's built p goal, then it's worth the expense for certain additionally... who knows maybe sombody might invent somthing that is more efficient or discover something like a benificial offshoot.. who knws what the cost will be one day to supercool a antenna, of which dipole is one of many kinds |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Yaesu FT-857D questions | Equipment | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| EH Antenna Revisited | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||