http://www.cellular.co.za/news_2001/...ay_do_harm.htm

--
http://www.stressed-out.org
CS Public #1, 195.242.236.171:27015 ff=on, awp=off
CS Public #2, 195.242.236.171:27035 ff=on
CS Public #3, Mini_maps only 195.242.236.171:27045

"Paul Burridge" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:58:01 GMT, Trevor Day
wrote:

It is probably worth noting that, in my experience, most children use
their mobiles almost exclusively for 'texting' rather than 'talking';
presumably this carries significantly less risk perceived or otherwise.

I agree. Proximity is the dominant factor at work here. That's why
these scare stories about mobile phone masts and cancer are such
total nonsense.
There may well be some significant risk associated with the
conventional use of mobiles right next to the head, though. The EM
field is bound to invade brain tissue and the effects of such exposure
to even low levels of near-microwave frequencies are as yet not fully
known.
--

"What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.