Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Bruhns wrote:
(Agreeing with Keith...) Of course there MUST be instantaneous power, because if there is not, then one cannot find energy by taking the integral of power over time. The instantaneous value may be zero, or positive, or negative, of course. Or perhaps another way to look at it is that if energy, which itself is a function of time, is differentiable, then power must take on instantaneous values. I don't think there is any argument over whether it exists in the math model or not. My argument is that the concept lacks a lot of usefulness. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |