Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For ham radio it is conventional ( my thoughts) to see reflectors as
element/s placed behind a feed element where. like other elements in an array receive radio energy and then reradiate a portion of the received energy.If one wants to emulate a point radiation then many elements have to be arranged in parabolic fashion such that all R.F. received or transmitted meet at a common point. Now I really know didly #####about dishes as my world is made up from Yagis but now I am starting to think about these things which really raises questions about what I had previously accepted For instance, 1 Commercial dishes are not made of reflectors with a fraction of a wave length ( surface is smooth) So we have some how shifted from 'resonation' to a 'reflection' mode as in light even tho a resonance must still some how occur, but how and with what length reflectors ( multiple long wires?)? 2 If radiation/reception follows a common path then is the dual path radiation as seen with a Yagi (90 degrees apart) changed ? 3 What would the result be if multiple electrical connection lines were made between the horizontal reflectors (vert refl form)? The emergency operation is now over after a lousy week in hospital but I am grounded for the rest of the year ( pain and infections and physical inabilities) books and the like is a hard task but the laptop is at hand if I can find suitable links to study. Plans are complete and parts available for a 20 metre dipole with eight reflectors set in quasi parabolic form to deliver 14.5 dbi.BW 63 degrees which I hope then to reduce to 30 degrees for added gain. Feed dipole will be of variable length for different band use. Isn't experimentation great when failure is not considered disasterous to ones self esteem and resume? Regards Art |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() " wrote in message news:uEfjd.579123$8_6.52336@attbi_s04... For ham radio it is conventional ( my thoughts) to see reflectors as element/s placed behind a feed element where. like other elements in an array receive radio energy and then reradiate a portion of the received energy.If one wants to emulate a point radiation then many elements have to be arranged in parabolic fashion such that all R.F. received or transmitted meet at a common point. Now I really know didly #####about dishes as my world is made up from Yagis but now I am starting to think about these things which really raises questions about what I had previously accepted For instance, 1 Commercial dishes are not made of reflectors with a fraction of a wave length ( surface is smooth) So we have some how shifted from 'resonation' to a 'reflection' mode as in light even tho a resonance must still some how occur, but how and with what length reflectors ( multiple long wires?)? It is all about keeping things in phase. The parabolic dish just reflects the signal such that the phase at the feed is the same (or time delay) You can say they resonate, or have high currents but if an element is 1/4 wave away. it will pick it up. There some cross bread antennas between dishes and Yagi too. mostly in 1 to 2 G band. 2 If radiation/reception follows a common path then is the dual path radiation as seen with a Yagi (90 degrees apart) changed ? Yagi with reflector and director has one fat beam off the end, and some lobes too. 3 What would the result be if multiple electrical connection lines were made between the horizontal reflectors (vert refl form)? On a yagi? The emergency operation is now over after a lousy week in hospital but I am grounded for the rest of the year ( pain and infections and physical inabilities) books and the like is a hard task but the laptop is at hand if I can find suitable links to study. Plans are complete and parts available for a 20 metre dipole with eight reflectors set in quasi parabolic form to deliver 14.5 dbi.BW 63 degrees which I hope then to reduce to 30 degrees for added gain. Feed dipole will be of variable length for different band use. Isn't experimentation great when failure is not considered disasterous to ones self esteem and resume? Regards Art Good luck with the health. Phase is the name of the game, they use phased towers at AM band to switch the pattern around from day to night, usually you will see 6 in a rough circle, all 50 to 150 foot high. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Isn't experimentation great when failure is not considered disasterous to ones self esteem and resume? Thomas Edison referred to failed experiments as ways of 'eliminating' the things that don't work. So a failed experiment is not a failure at all. But its a lot more fun when we find things that DO work !! --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 01:49:17 -0500, "Hal Rosser"
wrote: So a failed experiment is not a failure at all. Hi Hal, It has been observed that if you haven't failed, you haven't tried hard enough. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hal Rosser wrote:
Isn't experimentation great when failure is not considered disasterous to ones self esteem and resume? Thomas Edison referred to failed experiments as ways of 'eliminating' the things that don't work. Rumor was that Edison didn't like AC, didn't experiment much with it, and didn't think it would work. That was good news for Westinghouse. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
calling the longer element 'behind' the driven element of a yagi a
'reflector' is poor terminology. it does not actually 'reflect' it just resonates at a slightly different point and the combination of phase and distance from the driven element contribute to the gain in the 'forward' direction and cancel out signals in the 'backward' direction. actual reflection requires a conductive surface several wavelengths long in all directions as is done on parabolic dishes for microwave use. even when you look at vhf/uhf yagi's that have multiple reflectors they are still only using the phase shift of the resonance of them to add or cancel energy from certain directions. the smallest one that might be really called a reflector is the 'corner reflector' antenna sometimes used at vhf and uhf. " wrote in message news:uEfjd.579123$8_6.52336@attbi_s04... For ham radio it is conventional ( my thoughts) to see reflectors as element/s placed behind a feed element where. like other elements in an array receive radio energy and then reradiate a portion of the received energy.If one wants to emulate a point radiation then many elements have to be arranged in parabolic fashion such that all R.F. received or transmitted meet at a common point. Now I really know didly #####about dishes as my world is made up from Yagis but now I am starting to think about these things which really raises questions about what I had previously accepted For instance, 1 Commercial dishes are not made of reflectors with a fraction of a wave length ( surface is smooth) So we have some how shifted from 'resonation' to a 'reflection' mode as in light even tho a resonance must still some how occur, but how and with what length reflectors ( multiple long wires?)? 2 If radiation/reception follows a common path then is the dual path radiation as seen with a Yagi (90 degrees apart) changed ? 3 What would the result be if multiple electrical connection lines were made between the horizontal reflectors (vert refl form)? The emergency operation is now over after a lousy week in hospital but I am grounded for the rest of the year ( pain and infections and physical inabilities) books and the like is a hard task but the laptop is at hand if I can find suitable links to study. Plans are complete and parts available for a 20 metre dipole with eight reflectors set in quasi parabolic form to deliver 14.5 dbi.BW 63 degrees which I hope then to reduce to 30 degrees for added gain. Feed dipole will be of variable length for different band use. Isn't experimentation great when failure is not considered disasterous to ones self esteem and resume? Regards Art |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message ... calling the longer element 'behind' the driven element of a yagi a 'reflector' is poor terminology. it does not actually 'reflect' it just resonates at a slightly different point and the combination of phase and distance from the driven element contribute to the gain in the 'forward' direction and cancel out signals in the 'backward' direction. actual reflection requires a conductive surface several wavelengths long in all directions as is done on parabolic dishes for microwave use. Dave So how does one "create" several conductive surfaces of what ever length on a continuos electrical surface? My reflectors will consist of individual elements tho I may well eventually connect them vertically at a later point. If one should look at it in terms of phase and distance then how is the length of the phase changing element determined on a continuos surface? even when you look at vhf/uhf yagi's that have multiple reflectors they are still only using the phase shift of the resonance of them to add or cancel energy from certain directions. the smallest one that might be really called a reflector is the 'corner reflector' antenna sometimes used at vhf and uhf. Since my wave length is long, does it really matter if the spacings between reflectors is :"open" for a small fraction of a wave length? Can fields exist to deter penatration? My cruising on the net has not provided one example of a "dish" style antenna for H.F. yet it would appear that there are advantages there if backyard space is small, especially for multi band use. .. Surely, somewhere in ham radio history, a demarcation line for dish antennas has been ascertained based on advantages versus disadvantages ! If gain and f/b ( prime specs for the amateur) can be manipulated into higher extremes using dishes then is it reluctance to change or to lead that dominates the hobby based on the notion that all is now known? There seem to be so many advantages with this aproach now that weight issues are overcome with foil coated fishing poles that I wonder what it is I am missing in a much experimented field where this portion has been pre dismissed or where coil dissertation is to prove greater inroads in the hobby.. In this particular case I would welcome negative comments from those with expertise in the field so that these aspects can be given more thought,but then expertise is not a real requirement since so little is written. Regards Art " wrote in message news:uEfjd.579123$8_6.52336@attbi_s04... For ham radio it is conventional ( my thoughts) to see reflectors as element/s placed behind a feed element where. like other elements in an array receive radio energy and then reradiate a portion of the received energy.If one wants to emulate a point radiation then many elements have to be arranged in parabolic fashion such that all R.F. received or transmitted meet at a common point. Now I really know didly #####about dishes as my world is made up from Yagis but now I am starting to think about these things which really raises questions about what I had previously accepted For instance, 1 Commercial dishes are not made of reflectors with a fraction of a wave length ( surface is smooth) So we have some how shifted from 'resonation' to a 'reflection' mode as in light even tho a resonance must still some how occur, but how and with what length reflectors ( multiple long wires?)? 2 If radiation/reception follows a common path then is the dual path radiation as seen with a Yagi (90 degrees apart) changed ? 3 What would the result be if multiple electrical connection lines were made between the horizontal reflectors (vert refl form)? The emergency operation is now over after a lousy week in hospital but I am grounded for the rest of the year ( pain and infections and physical inabilities) books and the like is a hard task but the laptop is at hand if I can find suitable links to study. Plans are complete and parts available for a 20 metre dipole with eight reflectors set in quasi parabolic form to deliver 14.5 dbi.BW 63 degrees which I hope then to reduce to 30 degrees for added gain. Feed dipole will be of variable length for different band use. Isn't experimentation great when failure is not considered disasterous to ones self esteem and resume? Regards Art |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
"So how does one "create" several conductive surfaces of what ever length on a continuous electrical surface?" First examine the ways it has already been done and ask why? A non-resonant reflector provides a much wider bandwidth than a resonant reflector as used in an array like a yagi, for one thing. Plenty of grid-dish, corner-reflector and similar non-resonant reflector antennas are in use to reduce wind-loading. You have no need at lower frequencies to use solid reflectors. Surface irregularities are not much problem. The solid dishes at 2-GHz are built that way for convenience, not because they need to be. The same is true at lower frequencies. At higher frequencies, the conductors are so close together, there isn`t enough reduction in wind-loading to be worth the construction effort required with grid-reflectors. Grid reflectors only need a collection of conductors parallel with the radiating element(s) illuminating (driving) the antenna, and placed for best results. Reflecting elemants in a grid reflector placed perpendicular to the driven element don`t work. Curvature is used tn dish reflector bars for focus. An angle is used in the corner-reflector for more gain than a flat reflector. None of the reflectors needs cross-connections between the reflector bars anymore than ground radials need their far-ends interconnected. Such connections allow eddy currents which only cause loss. The only current of value is that in the direction of the ground radials or in the direction of the reflector`s parallel conductors, as the case may be. So the eddy currents are bad. Spacing between reflector bars is related to wavelength and capture area.. Measure it in a good grid antenna and scale to your frequency. Or, see Kraus for capture area etc. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art:
Here is a URL with a couple of photos of HF antennas with real reflectors. For more, do a search for FRD-10, FLR-9, and Wullenweber. Just look at the photos; most of the text is, unfortunately, not very accurate. While I never knew the German originators of the design during WW2, I did work with the engineer who developed the US version back in the 50s. http://www.mindspring.com/~cummings7/wullen.html -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
i dont' know if i would really call them 'reflectors'. from the shape and
spacing i would think they were more of a vertical ground screen behind the monopoles. kind of like having a dipole mounted above a ground screen, it would provide some directionality outward and shield them from noise from the building inside. "Crazy George" wrote in message ... Art: Here is a URL with a couple of photos of HF antennas with real reflectors. For more, do a search for FRD-10, FLR-9, and Wullenweber. Just look at the photos; most of the text is, unfortunately, not very accurate. While I never knew the German originators of the design during WW2, I did work with the engineer who developed the US version back in the 50s. http://www.mindspring.com/~cummings7/wullen.html -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Signal interference with nearby aluminum reflectors? | Antenna | |||
Signal interference with nearby aluminum reflectors? | Antenna |