| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
November 10th 04, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On 10 Nov 2004 11:42:21 -0800, (Dr. Slick) wrote:
I didn't need a choke with this one = the other factor |
|
#2
November 11th 04, 04:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote in message . ..
On 10 Nov 2004 11:42:21 -0800, (Dr. Slick) wrote: I didn't need a choke with this one = the other factor Incorrect. I simply didn't need it for this dipole. Anyone else? S. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
| 40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
| Bricks effect in dipole resonance? Help! | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
