| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
November 11th 04, 04:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Clark wrote in message . ..
On 10 Nov 2004 11:36:02 -0800, (Dr. Slick) wrote: Richard Clark wrote in message . .. On 8 Nov 2004 17:13:32 -0800, (Dr. Slick) wrote: guess what the problem was. Why do you think it was a problem? A double dip is a bad sign, and your return loss is not optimum. What makes a double dip a bad sign? Most antennas have many. What does any dip have to do with non-optimal return loss? By definition a dip in SWR indicates better return loss. A double dip in a very narrow band, like 88-108 MHz for example, is a real indication of something wrong. It has always meant that the maximum return loss suffers. S. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
| 40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
| Bricks effect in dipole resonance? Help! | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
