| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
November 12th 04, 06:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:34:39 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote: Radials? I missed that. On 11 Nov 2004 12:20:02 -0800, (Dr. Slick) wrote: Hint: no inductive choke was needed, and the radial lengths remained the same. Problem: Unconventional usage leads to unconventional claims; shortly followed by unconventional physics offered as proof in terms of unconventional usage - familiar? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
| 40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
| Bricks effect in dipole resonance? Help! | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
