On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:34:39 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Radials? I missed that.

On 11 Nov 2004 12:20:02 -0800, (Dr. Slick) wrote:
Hint: no inductive choke was needed, and the radial
lengths remained the same.

Problem: Unconventional usage leads to unconventional claims; shortly
followed by unconventional physics offered as proof in terms of
unconventional usage - familiar?