Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Uwe
I cant resist... Brrrr COLD! I visited Toronto early this year and havent gotten over the throat irritation yet! It was about 33C when I left Sydney and -25C when I got to Toronto! Well then I can now see the use of employing the narrowest band design possible, assuming you only want the Canadian station. Personally I wouldnt want to limit its bandwidth because I *might* one day want to use it for another distant station. Is it worthwhile doing an analysis of those stations that might interfere? Like if the interfering source is at 90 degrees heading from the station you want, anything that starts as a dipole element will help. If its directly behind you may want to adjust for best front to back, even to the point of tuning the reflector with some C. This BTW is much easier on a quad reflector than a yagi. (ie make a "Qagi") My theoru isnt good on this, but I can see you want a design that has got low sidelobes and good front to back. Yagis can be optimised for all manner of things so one design you see may work great for f/b but bad in sidelobes. Is a phased array better? (ie mount your boom at right angles to the station and use 2 element designs) How does a quad or helix compare? Does choosing circular polarisation help? This is actually a more difficult problem than first thought. My path would be not to think too much, but put up a helix and see how it performs. I use to have one on 2M for satellite work that I also used for terrestrial TV and FM. (Very wide band) I was however in a zero interference area. Given though that I guess you want to go with a yagi design, my thought is to build it to the Canadian station frequency with a tuned refelector and also see what happens. When you have built it plot the pattern at various frequencies. Have a look at Mr Cebiks web page on OWA yagi's. (http://www.cebik.com/2mowa1.html) He often shows radiation patterns and lots of other data. Well worth a look. Apologies for the length! Cheers Bob VK2YQA Uwe wrote: Bob, the reason to want the high gain is as follows. I live in Maine south of the Canadian border, close but not quite close enough to receive Canadian FM stations. I can receive one station faintly using a Radio Shack BC band antenna and wanted to expand on that with a better antenna and possibly a change in IF filters in the tuner I use. And I thought that a very high gain antenna with its narrow pattern would also aide in adjacent channel rejection. I realize that it could be a problem covering the entire BC band and I am not set on any particular design, I first wanted to see what people here had to say. Regards Uwe KB1JOW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna | |||
Antenna tuner | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |