Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 18th 04, 07:56 PM
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Richard Clark wrote:

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:49:36 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

"All of the photon energy present in these (canceled) waves
must somehow be recovered or redistributed in a new direction, ..."


Was and has been Orthogonal to the direction of propagation - nothing
has changed.

There's only one other direction in a transmission line and that's
back toward the load.


This does not follow from the other.


Moreover, the point being missed by the original correspondent (one
which is obvious from this and other descriptions of the phenomena), is
that no _energy_ is transferred in the direction of totally destructive
interfering waves - a point which I have made repeatedly on this
newsgroup, and which he has steadfastly refused to accept. The
observation that the energy in question must go elsewhere remains obvious.

73, Jim AC6XG

  #2   Report Post  
Old November 18th 04, 09:27 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Kelley wrote:
Moreover, the point being missed by the original correspondent (one
which is obvious from this and other descriptions of the phenomena), is
that no _energy_ is transferred in the direction of totally destructive
interfering waves - a point which I have made repeatedly on this
newsgroup, and which he has steadfastly refused to accept.


You know that's a false statement, one of many you have made about
my postings.

Of course, no energy is transferred past the match point in the
direction of totally destructive interfering waves. DUUUHHHHHH,
THAT'S WHY THE REFLECTED POWER METER READS ZERO ON THE SOURCE
SIDE OF THE MATCH POINT, DUUUHHHHHH. And that's why the reflected
energy traveling toward the source on the load side of the match
point gets redistributed in the only other available direction,
i.e. re-reflected back toward the load.

What I said was: For two reflected waves to cancel, they must
first exist even if for only an infinitesimally small amount of
time. Since you disagree with that, it means the reflected waves
never existed. And if, as you say, they never existed, how could
they possibly cancel? You seem to have invented a new phenomena -
two waves canceling without the waves ever existing.
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reflected power ? new thread, new beginning, kinda ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 6 May 25th 04 11:45 PM
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) Dr. Slick Antenna 98 August 30th 03 03:09 AM
Cecil's Math a Blunder Jim Kelley Antenna 34 July 27th 03 09:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017