Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:28:22 GMT, Richard Clark
wrote: |On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 16:53:59 -0700, Wes Stewart |wrote: | |If you wouild cite the pages to which you refer, I would gladly scan |then to pdf and post them for all to reference. | |Hi Wes, | |The math is on the bottom of pg. 203 which is supporting Fig. 9-26. | |There is also a section entitled 8.8 Multiple reflections on ppg |174...176. | |Then there is the specific math of fully specified matches at both |ends, that is at the source and the load, found in Fig. 10-7 that is |supported by discussion on ppg. 225...227. | |All of this bears on discussion around and about the necessary |treatment of the Z of the Source, but I haven't supplied all the |citations within this one reference by any means. | |Thanx, Wes. You needn't do all these scans. The group needs to do |their own heavy lifting to escape their naivety about source Z. Hi Richard, I did it anyway. [g] Hope this covers it: http://users.triconet.org/wesandlind...rdClarkRef.pdf Regards, Wes |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna |