Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:25:32 -0800, Jim Kelley
wrote: A circulator, being in general a three (or four) port directional device, might have some trouble buying into that logic. ;-) The crux of the phenomenological problem is that power does not flow or move, nor is it something that is reflected. Hi Jim, I merely responded in like metaphors. To this point, the meditation of the difference between Bob's results and the ARRL table speculates that the ARRL used an unknown Intel 100W circulating Signal Generator driving 1 second's worth of transmission line where Poynters Theorem proves that the dB loss is - well, we never get to the end, do we? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna |