| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Richard Harrison" wrote in message
... Ian White, G3SEK wrote: "The only technical issue is the "assumption" that the conjugate of the load impedance is equal to the output impedance of the device." It`s true if maximum power is being transferred. King, Mimno, and Wing sat so on page 43 of "Transmission Lines, Antennas, and Wave Guides": "If a dissipationless network is inserted betweeen a constant-voltage generator of internal impedance Zg, and a load of impedance ZR such that maximum power is delivered to the load, at every pair of terminals the impedances looking in opposite directions are conjugates of each other." The authors, Arnie, Larry, and Alex were all teaching at Harvard in 1945 when their book was published. Walter Maxwell, W2DU has been saying the same thing yet has mistaken nay-sayerrs. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI Maximum power transfer with conjugate matching is undisputed. The problem with semi-conductor devices is that you cannot necessarily conjugate match because the device operating parameters may be exceeded. 73, Frank |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
| Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||