chuck wrote:
I do agree that the error introduced by using an SWR minimum as a proxy
for zero reactance would not alone account for Ken's results.

I have only just now read this thread so I am ignorant of anything
that has been posted before. I just want to add that, using my MFJ-
259B, the minimum SWR is not usually at the same frequency as the
purely resistive reading. Draw your own conclusions from that
measurement.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp