Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 4th 04, 08:04 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"chuck" wrote in message
nk.net...
Hello Gary,

Don't know from personal experience, but Les Moxon, author of HF
Antennas for all Locations, seems to believe it creates an advantage.
You might want to read his thoughts on that.


====================================

What makes you think he is more right than anybody else?

Why should you be a judge?

Why do you seek support from paid book writers?

Do you lack confidence in your personal judgement and statements?

This small, slightly critical, message is intended to be in the most
friendly of terms. Applicable to many others in these threads.

I wish you the all best of both local stations and DX. And, as the festive
season approaches, an enjoyable Xmas holiday for both you and your family.
----
Reg.


  #2   Report Post  
Old December 4th 04, 07:05 AM
Hal Rosser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gary V. Deutschmann, Sr." wrote in message

Several of them have their ground mounted HF antenna's perpendicular
to the grade of the land rather than vertical. In other words, the
top of the antenna is roughly 90 inches off center toward the downhill
side.



That vertical must be *downhill* from the house - else loss of sleep will
occur.
And wouldn't the uphill guy wires need to be doubled up ?



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.799 / Virus Database: 543 - Release Date: 11/20/2004


  #3   Report Post  
Old December 4th 04, 04:21 PM
Irv Finkleman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hal Rosser wrote:

"Gary V. Deutschmann, Sr." wrote in message

Several of them have their ground mounted HF antenna's perpendicular
to the grade..


That vertical must be *downhill* from the house - else loss of sleep will
occur.
And wouldn't the uphill guy wires need to be doubled up ?

Does the term 'uphill' guys imply that there are 'downhill' guys? Would
they be required? Be careful not to confuse the term 'downhill guys' with
old hams.

Irv VE6BP
--------------------------------------
Diagnosed Type II Diabetes March 5 2001
Beating it with diet and exercise!
297/215/210 (to be revised lower)
58"/43"(!)/44" (already lower too!)
--------------------------------------
Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/index.html
Visit my Baby Sofia website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/index.htm
Visit my OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/index.htm
--------------------
Irv Finkleman,
Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 5th 04, 02:42 AM
Hal Rosser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Does the term 'uphill' guys imply that there are 'downhill' guys? Would
they be required? Be careful not to confuse the term 'downhill guys' with
old hams.


Quite right!
One should not confuse the term "over the hill" with "downhill"
:-)


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.799 / Virus Database: 543 - Release Date: 11/19/2004


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017