Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's no doubt that many, or most, people could reduce their power by
a factor of 10 and still communicate ok. But 10 dB isn't a trivial amount ("only 1-2 S units"). I didn't mean to imply it was "trival". I have a little 100 watt XCVR that I use moblie and on field day that has a low power (7 watts) setting that I sometimes use to reduce battery drain. The qso total drops, but it is not as drastic as you would think with a 10 dB power reduction. Of course on low power I only go back to the guys with big signals, to make that 10dB seem less of a problem. I guess that 10 dB loss is all relative to where it is and what would be required to get it back. 73 Gary N4AST |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Additional Line Losses Due to SWR | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? | Antenna |