Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crazy George wrote:
John: 1 to 7 MHz is almost 3 octaves, and no simple antenna is going to present a usable impedance match to the coax over that range. Are you operating a spot frequency, a narrow band, or do you need the full range? If the latter, then you better look at remote antenna tuners, although I do not know of any which go below 1.6 MHz. Because, no matter what chokes, etc. you install, you will never decouple the outside of the coax from the antenna field enough to be able to successfully run it in a tray with low level signals. Been there, tried to do that. One thing you will eventually learn, forget the half-antenna (whip) and put up a dipole. Then, you have a fighting chance to keep the antenna currents in the antenna where you want them, and not on the outside of the feedline, which thinks it is the other half of the antenna when you employ a whip, even with radials. At 1 MHz, the radials need to be almost 300 feet long. -- All very good points. What it comes down to is that a whip always needs some kind of ground/radials/counterpoise connection at its base. You need something to feed the whip *against*. Older marine transmitters is that they tended to take a good 'ground' return for granted, so they only provided a single terminal for the antenna wire. If you convert to a coax output, it won't make any difference unless you have something to connect the shield of the coax to, out at the base of the whip. That "something" has to collect all the RF return current from the whip itself... and if it doesn't, all the building wiring and the outside of the coax will collect those currents instead. If you think of your office building as a very small 'ship', but without the benefit of all-metal construction or a decent salt-water ground, this is not a promising situation. In today's electronic office environment, I'm afraid you are likely to be fighting a perpetual losing battle against EMC problems. If this radio link matters, you'd do better to find another location for the transmitter and antenna. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|