Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary Schafer" wrote Jack, All three references are of the same article. Note the rebuttals at the end of one of them. I would also find it hard to believe that ANY rods on a 12000 foot mountain were not hit in 7 years! That study would suggest that pointed rods were excellent lightning repellers and would protect things from being struck. Exactly what Franklin first thought. If not excellent repellers then it would be highly suspect of the placement of the pointed rods on the mountain. 73 Gary K4FMX Hi Gary, the study is of course much more detailed than the articles describe, I'll see if I can find you a link or post the abstract here anyway. But no, there is absolutely no such conclusion in that study (or any other accepted work) that any device can prevent lightning from striking a particular point by "draining off" charges. 73, Jack |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
Reception in a tin can | Antenna |