Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... SNIP I sometimes think that the relatively few engineers between 1790 and 1890 performed greater engineering feats than the many who followed them into the present age of electronic and genetic engineering. They devoted the whole of their lives to their work. As for us poor souls, the best we can manage is haggling about imaginary SWR and conjugate matches which were all sorted out 120 years back. But it's all good fun. Cheers, Reg. That was back in the days when fantastic claims were settled with a working model. If you wanted to argue about the efficiency of a venturi, or the strength of a gear tooth profile, you built it and then actually used it. If your drill bit stayed sharp longer, or you pumped more water with less coal, you won your argument. We spend a lot of time now arguing about how well the computer model replicates reality, and whether the math has enough variables accounted for. Working models seem so old fashioned. Ed wb6wsn |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
Reception in a tin can | Antenna |