Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Price" writes:
... And BTW, what would be so bad about having some way to create a conductive channel from the charge to a place of YOUR choice? Even that modest goal could vastly expand the "cone of protection" that existing masts provide. Imagine being able to initiate safe cloud-to-cloud discharges. Imagine being able to direct all charge for a one-mile radius to discharge (even violently) to a designated lightning rod. One rod could protect an entire building; several rods could protect an entire large airport. My speculation about selection paths of ionization by RF excitation was just groping toward one way to create those channels, and HAARP naturally came to mind. A long time ago, there was some (theoretical at least) effort to see whether UV lasers could be used to create an ionized channel over a long distance. Something like that might do the job. OTOH a rainstorm is generally pretty opaque to UV. Teh RF excitation has already been tried -- I think someone has a patent on it. One problem with it is that where there is lightning there tends to be wind, so that the ionized air is blown away faster than it can be generated. Regards, Allen WA0OHE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
Reception in a tin can | Antenna |