Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jack Painter" wrote in message news:emUDd.11563$B95.6120@lakeread02... "Ed Price" wrote SNIP Regarding the RF excitation, I assumed that a single-point source would be dumb, because the best ionization path would be right back to YOU. But an array of exciters, electronically steered to create a sufficient power density at a focal point, is a lot smarter. Again, I don't know if the technique would work, but an electronically steered (more like focusing) array would be one way to do it. One poster said that the ionized channel might blow away in the wind. Maybe a quick system could "paint" an ionization channel fast enough. Maybe a system could detect and take advantage of leaders, to create a shorter path. Ed wb6wsn Hi Ed, using high powered lasers to "paint" a thunderstorm cloud has been done, and whether reliably or not, was able to trigger lightning. It hasn't translated into practical protection schemes yet, but that could simply be economics. As a means of triggering lightning to a safe point away from vulnerable assets, it still leaves the possibility that some storms are so powerful that nothing short of an extensive, multi-point array of lasers could ever offer protection at an individual point. It is generally so much less expensive to employ catenary wires overhead, build faraday-cages around, and position air terminals in appropriate areas than the costs of such a laser system. There would also be a new class of airspace required for operation of such lasers. Something like a "no-fly zone" in fact! ;-) 73, Jack Painter Virginia Beach, Virginia More like a "dead-fly" zone. Yeah, aircraft (and satellite / astronaut) protection are not trivial concerns when you start squirting power into the air. BTW, I seem to recall the use of small (sounding?) rockets used around the perimeter of the Kennedy launch complex. I don't recall if these rockets trailed a thin wire, or if their exhaust plume was sufficient to trigger a lightning discharge. Anyway, I thought I recall these small expendable rockets being used as a lightning diversion technique to protect the exposed launch vehicle. (Yes, I know they also use catenary wires from the tower to the ground, but the rocket technique was supposedly to condition the area around the vehicle just as launch occurred, and the tower was moved away from the vehicle.) Ed wb6wsn |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Automotive Diversity Reception problems- 98 Corvette | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
Reception in a tin can | Antenna |