Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
"---the distance was far enough to observe the effects of SWR - in exactly the same manner we observe them at HF or VHF etc." Yes, that was anticipated. The wavelength is a little less than 186,000 miles per second divided by 60 cycles per second, or 3100 miles per cycle approximately. The reduction in wavelength is due to the velocity factor of the transmission line. Construction determines the velocity factor. The phase delay ib transmission over the actual distance between Hoover Dam near Las Vegas and Los Angeles is only a few degrees. For example, a 60 Hz transmission line slectrical length of 310 miles would be 1/10 wavelength or about 36 degrees. Surely noticible but not crippling. Now, many high-voltage transmission lines are transporting d-c. The rule of thumb is that you need a kilovolt per mile of trangmission line length to get efficiency. So, hundreds of miles require hundreds of KV. At these voltages, the difference between rms and peak voltage becomes important. RMS = DC. Now, conveersion from a-c to d-c and back again is fairly easy and efficient. So, we have HV, DC power transmission. Tesla had the first laugh. Now, maybe Edison has the last laugh after a hundred years of development. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transmission Lines & Electrical Code | Antenna | |||
Question re High Tension Lines | Antenna | |||
Question about attenuators ... | Antenna | |||
BPL industry take on why power lines are not antennas | Antenna | |||
basic question about radio waves !!!! | Antenna |