Seems to be, indeed, though you never know. The lurkers may well have
learned a thing or two. The one reference you did post now disavows
the form you posted. You've been invited to do some simple math that
would show you the truth and you apparently refuse. You are posting
any number of ideas contrary to what's easy to show from fundamentals
and what's in a large number of published papers and texts and what
has been posted here by many contributors recently and over the years.
It's been done with both symbolic math and specific examples.
Several inconsistencies demonstrate clearly that Vr/Vf does NOT equal
(Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), and of course most certainly a (Zload-Zo)
denominator is going to get you quickly into trouble. The
inconsistencies have been pointed out here by me and by others, but
apparently you've missed them. I'm sure it's apparent to most lurking
where the communications is breaking down. But the formulas you
posted above have given me a good laugh tonight, at least! Thanks!

Cheers,
Tom

When a fine engineer, with a good education and a distinguished
career, stoops to argue with an anonymous fellow who doesn't
have a firm grasp of even the most basic ideas of wave mechanics,
the result is bound to be a certain amount of frustration. You might
want to ask yourself, Tom, whether Slick is arguing in good faith,
or whether he has other motives.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH