Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter O. Brackett wrote:
But I maintain that is "unatural" and "Mother Nature" naturally likes the classical rho = (Z - Zo)/(Z + Zo) Thoughts, comments? I agree with you, Peter. That's what I have been calling the physical reflection coefficient. At the junction of two transmission lines of different characteristic impedances, it becomes s11=(Z02-Z01)/(Z02+Z01) and is usually not equal to rho=Sqrt(Pref/Pfwd). -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |