wrote:
I observe that you make the assertion, but fail to do the arithmetic
to demonstrate the assertion, while Roy does the arithmetic which
seems to contradict your assertion. There is a strong suspicion that
the reason you don't do the arithmetic (since you do seem fond of
numerical examples) in this case is that you have been unable to make
arithmetic produce the desired result.

I don't need to waste my time on arithmetic to prove that the
principle of conservation of energy is valid. Anyone who believes
that the reflected power in a passive circuit can ever be greater
than the forward power is simply NUTS and should resign from the
human race!

Roy's assertion that reflected power is greater than forward power
is simply the result of omniscientism, defined by a refusal to
collect like terms in the manner that his 4th grade teacher taught
him to do. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----