Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 24th 04, 12:59 AM
W4JLE
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No it is Illegitimus non carborundum
"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:50:04 -0500, J. Teske
wrote:
Illegitimi noncarborundum

It is Non Illegitimus Carborundum




  #2   Report Post  
Old January 30th 05, 08:33 PM
Percival P. Cassidy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The only version I've ever seen or heard is "Non carborundum
illegitimi," but IMO the "non" should be "ne" because the verb is
imperative or subjunctive (or ought to be, anyway).

Perce


On 12/23/04 07:59 pm W4JLE tossed the following ingredients into the
ever-growing pot of cybersoup:

No it is Illegitimus non carborundum


Illegitimi noncarborundum


It is Non Illegitimus Carborundum

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. Ben Antenna 0 January 6th 04 12:18 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017