Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No it is Illegitimus non carborundum
"Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:50:04 -0500, J. Teske wrote: Illegitimi noncarborundum It is Non Illegitimus Carborundum |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only version I've ever seen or heard is "Non carborundum
illegitimi," but IMO the "non" should be "ne" because the verb is imperative or subjunctive (or ought to be, anyway). Perce On 12/23/04 07:59 pm W4JLE tossed the following ingredients into the ever-growing pot of cybersoup: No it is Illegitimus non carborundum Illegitimi noncarborundum It is Non Illegitimus Carborundum |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |