Richard, I can only admire your adeptness at judging my motives for the
intervention.


But you are not exactly correct. Let's await further developments - if
any!


( I really do think the English and USA written languages are coming close
together again. Welcome! All due to that modern invention - the
Internet.)

( I understand the BBC Over-seas Service is widely heard in the USA - again
over the Internet rather than the old-fashioned, beamed, short-wave radio
waves.)

----
Reg.

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 04:12:38 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

Richard, I can only admire your adeptness at judging my motives for the
intervention.


But you are not exactly correct. Let's await further developments - if
any!


( I really do think the English and USA written languages are coming close
together again. Welcome! All due to that modern invention - the
Internet.)

( I understand the BBC Over-seas Service is widely heard in the USA - again
over the Internet rather than the old-fashioned, beamed, short-wave radio
waves.)


We can even get BBC domestic news here on cable television.

Jon W3JT
----
Reg.

Reg, G4FGQ wrote:
"(I understand the BBC Over-seas Service ie widely heard in the USA -
again over the internet rather than the old-fashioned short-wave radio
waves.)"

I have not tried the BBC via the internet. But I do try to warch its
Evening News Program on PBS Television every night. It`s simply the best
coverage if not the most pictures. How much fire-footage do we really
need?

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI