Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's really quite simple and fundamental. The "takeoff angle" (elevation
angle at which the pattern is maximum) depends on both the height and the free-space vertical pattern of the antenna. Yagis end up having a vertical pattern similar to a dipole in the forward direction because the Yagi provides very little concentration in the elevation plane. Some antennas do provide substantial concentration in the elevation plane, however, such as a W8JK, or collinear as you mention. The elevation patterns of vertically polarized antennas are further modified by the different reflection coefficient encountered by vertically polarized waves. Kraus has a good discussion of ground reflection coefficient in _Antennas_. The vertical patterns reported by AO and similar programs can be derived by hand from the free space pattern and reflections from the ground using the reflection coefficients derived in Kraus. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Art Unwin KB9MZ wrote: I had always thought that take off angle was a function purely based on ht over ground and nothing else. When experimenting with my AO computor program on colliear arangements I.E. without booms, I am finding that the 'Take off' angle becomes lower with increasing gain over a dipole. The top edge of the leading lobe stays constant with that of a single dipole but with the slight lowering of the lobe angle as much as 1db of increase in gain are obtainable at the LOWEST angle. Does anyone know of a text book that discusses the why's and wherefores of these lower angle gains together with its 'known' limitations? Is it possible that it is a parallelogram resultant of increased vector value versus the ground influence constant? Regards Art Unwin |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
lining up microwave antenna's | Antenna | |||
Inverted "V" with angle=60° | Antenna |