LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old August 25th 03, 09:01 AM
Ian White, G3SEK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tdonaly wrote:


Since the days of Fresnel (1788-1827), this information has been known. To
admit that ham radio is 300 years behind the times is pretty sad.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


O.K., Cecil, I want to make a Fresnel lens antenna for forty meters.
What does it look like,


Big.

About 1429 times larger than the one for 10GHz that was published in
'Ham Radio' some years ago. Fresnel optics (either concentric refractive
rings or concentric apertures) works perfectly well at RF wavelengths.

and how do I make one?


First hire a crane, and then...


--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017