Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Harrison wrote:
Keith wrote: "Is it step 7)?" "7) From 6), the energy crossing quarter wave points is zero" False, as are several other of Keith`s speculations. I do not see any flaw in step 7). Assuming that step 6) "6) From 2) and 5), the power (rate of energy flowing) at quarter wave points will be 0" is correct, then step 7) "7) From 6), the energy crossing quarter wave points is 0" must also be true, since, If the rate of energy flowing is zero, then there is no energy flowing so there can not be any energy crossing the point. I do not find that step 7) is in error. If there is an error in the final conclusion then I do not think that it is an error in step 7) which causes the final error, but, rather, the error must be in one of the earlier steps. ....Keith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into thesame... | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR intothesame... | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |