Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
wrote:
I do not see any flaw in step 7). Try opening your eyes. If the rate of energy flowing is zero, then there is no energy flowing so there can not be any energy crossing the point. There is no NET energy flow. There is plenty of component energy flow as defined by Ramo & Whinnery's forward Poynting vector and reflected Poynting vector. Why do you continue to ignore those vectors? Why do you continue to ignore the wealth of knowledge contained in light interference patterns? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into thesame... | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR intothesame... | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |