Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith wrote:
"The last is true, but p(t) = v(t)*i(t); volts and amps must be present simultaneously for there to be power." By the same token, a-c flow is discontinuous at all zero crossings! I don`t think so. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Keith wrote: "The last is true, but p(t) = v(t)*i(t); volts and amps must be present simultaneously for there to be power." By the same token, a-c flow is discontinuous at all zero crossings! I don`t think so. There is certainly no power at the zero crossings. This variation in the rate of energy flow is why the power dudes really prefer 3 phase; energy flow is constant. ....Keith |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() W5DXP wrote: wrote: There is certainly no power at the zero crossings. There is no NET power at the zero crossings. I think you mean there's no instantaneous power at the zero crossings. 73, ac6xg |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
W5DXP wrote: There is no NET power at the zero crossings. I think you mean there's no instantaneous power at the zero crossings. Well, since the NET voltage is always zero at a voltage node when the forward power and reflected power are equal, the instantaneous voltage is always zero, i.e. the steady-state voltage is always zero. If we have equal power flow vectors in opposite directions, the NET power is zero at all points up and down the line. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() W5DXP wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: W5DXP wrote: There is no NET power at the zero crossings. I think you mean there's no instantaneous power at the zero crossings. Well, since the NET voltage is always zero at a voltage node when the forward power and reflected power are equal, the instantaneous voltage is always zero, i.e. the steady-state voltage is always zero. I've never actually seen the voltage at a node in a standing wave pattern referred to as an instantaneous voltage - especially considering that it doesn't vary with time. Instantaneous usually means the solution to a function f(t) at time t (not f(x) and position x.) Nodes and zero crossings aren't necessarily the same thing. 73, Jim AC6XG |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Nodes and zero crossings aren't necessarily the same thing. They are for standing waves on lossless unterminated lines, by definition. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into thesame... | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR intothesame... | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |