LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old August 27th 03, 09:52 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarmo Tammaru" wrote

It might be worthwhile explaining how they came up with Gamma max =

2.414,
instead of some huge number. They say that the phase angle of Zo is
constrained to +/- 45 degrees for R, G, L, and C non-negative.

=================================

Tam, who are "They" ?

Are "they" the "One million housewives who can't be wrong" ?

Or might it be Oliver Heaviside around 1872 ?

It would be a mistake to found a restart of these arithmetical arguments on
rumour.
---
Yours, Reg, G4FGQ ;o)












 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) Dr. Slick Antenna 98 August 30th 03 03:09 AM
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... Peter O. Brackett Antenna 8 August 28th 03 06:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017