Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Tarmo Tammaru" wrote
It might be worthwhile explaining how they came up with Gamma max = 2.414, instead of some huge number. They say that the phase angle of Zo is constrained to +/- 45 degrees for R, G, L, and C non-negative. ================================= Tam, who are "They" ? Are "they" the "One million housewives who can't be wrong" ? Or might it be Oliver Heaviside around 1872 ? It would be a mistake to found a restart of these arithmetical arguments on rumour. --- Yours, Reg, G4FGQ ;o) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna |